PRESS
RELEASE - 5th June 2001 -
World Environment Day
New report links
incinerators to cancers and other health impacts
When you were last in hospital did
you give a moment’s thought to where your medial waste would end?
Have you considered that the very people tasked with improving
your health, the medical sector, by burning medical waste, are
possibly responsible for several of the diseases and cancers suffered
by you and your family? Or that the glass of milk you drank this
morning could give you cancer?
On this the
5th of June, World Environment Day, groundWork joins with
Greenpeace International to release an explosive new report showing
links between waste incinerators and mortality due to various
cancers, as well as a higher incidence of lung disease, sarcoma,
congenital malformations and immune system depression.
The report
is entitled Incineration and Human Health - State of knowledge
of the Impacts of Waste Incinerators on Human Health.
The book consolidates
over 300 studies and research papers that have focused on the
impacts of incineration on human health. The book looks both at
studies conducted on incinerator workers, as well as on population
living adjacent to incinerators. The evidence is shocking.
According to
the report, incinerator workers are more likely to die from lung
cancer, gastric cancer, oesophageal cancer and heart disease than
average members of the population. In addition they are more likely
to suffer from chloracne, decreased liver function and increased
allergy. People living in the vicinity of incinerators have an
increased chance of dying from lung cancer and liver cancer. In
addition they are more likely to suffer from soft tissue sarcoma,
respiratory problems, lung disease, bronchitis, cancer of the
larynx, spina bifida, congenital malformations among new borns
and altered sex ratio of new borns. (See attached 3 pages for
tables extracted from the Greenpeace report.)
The report
identifies more than 190 chemicals that are released from incinerators.
The most toxic of these are dioxins, furans, mercury and lead.
Dioxins and furans are two of the “dirty dozen” chemicals targeted
in a new United Nations Convention for elimination.
The SA government
estimates that there over 300 incinerators in South Africa, although
only about 50% of these are government’s books. The majority of
incinerators in SA are medical waste incinerators, and the remainders
are industrial incinerators, hazardous waste and veterinary.
According to
a 1999 government report,[1]
“most incineration facilities for medical and other wastes cannot
meet the required emission standards and therefore have an unacceptable
impact on human health and the environment”. The same report stated
that there was an “urgent need” to draw up emission standards
for incinerators and to close down inefficient incinerators. To
date neither of these “urgent needs” has been addressed. groundWork
knows of only one incinerator which has been shut down in the
last couple of years, and this was largely due to pressure placed
upon government by civil society.
While many
of these incinerators are located in industrial areas or poorer
communities, several are located in upper income areas. For example,
the Hillcrest Hospital operates their own incinerators on site.
However, according to government records, this incinerator is
not registered.
A large number
of incinerators are also located in rural areas and/or adjacent
to farms. For example the largest incinerator in KwaZulu-Natal
is located in Ixopo, which is the heart of dairy country. There
have been several scares internationally about dairy products
and beef being contaminated by dioxins from incinerators. There
is every reason to believe that dairy products originating from
the Ixopo area are highly contaminated with cancer-causing dioxins.
groundWork
will this week be sending copies of this report to Minister
Moosa and other officials in the government, calling for a moratorium
on all new incinerator projects, the phasing out of existing incinerators
and the active investigation and implementation of alternative
technologies.
The report
also addresses the misconception that incinerators reduce waste
volumes. It argues that the combined outputs of all air emissions,
ash, and wastewater exceed the initial waste inputs. More importantly
these outputs are more often far more toxic then the original
waste fed into the incinerator.
This report
can be downloaded from the Greenpeace International web page (www.greenpeace.org/~toxics/)
or can be obtained from groundWork.
[1]
National Waste Management Strategies and Action Plans South
Africa, Action Plan for Waste Treatment and Disposal, 15 October
1999, Ref No. Reports\Formal\4.1.22\AP Treatment & Disposal.
|