PRESS RELEASE - 5 May 2005
Governments urged to keep the promise and eliminate pollutants
- and not allow hazardous waste to be burnt in cement kilns
This week marks the first Conference of Parties (COP1) meeting
on the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants
(POPs) [1], which is being held from the 2 - 6 May 2005, at
Punta del Este, Uruguay. Governments are meeting to discuss
amongst other issues the constitution of the POPs Review Committee,
the adoption of the Best Available Techniques (BAT) / Best
Environmental Practice (BET) guidelines [2] and the adoption
of the Dioxin Toolkit [3].
Environmental activists at COP 1 are calling on governments
to "Keep the Promise" and take action to fulfil
their obligations under the Stockholm Convention of eliminating
POPs. The challenge for governments is to honour the Convention's
goal of reducing toxic pollution and protecting public health
and the environment.
In view of this, civil society in South Africa has been lobbying
government to give consideration to alternative technologies.
Of special concern at the moment is the continent wide push
by the cement industries to burn hazardous wastes in cement
kilns (incinerators).
Additionally, international civil society organisations have
cautioned governments on the BAT/BEP adoption. Accordingly,
Manny Calonzo of the Global Alliance for Incineration Alternatives
(GAIA), the guidelines remain a work-in-progress since a reader
of the guidelines could easily conclude that it is acceptable
for any cement kiln, of any design, in any region of the world,
to accept and burn POPs waste. Even if properly operated,
a cement kiln would result in unintentional releases of POPs
such as dioxins and furans [4].
According to Llewellyn Leonard of groundWork, the South African
government has sent out varied signals on their position on
burning of hazardous wastes. On the one hand we find that
government officials have requested a local cement industry
to burn agricultural waste such as obsolete pesticides and
herbicides. While on the other hand we have DEAT holding workshops
to establish national implementation plans for the management
and strategies to clean up and prevent future accumulation
of unwanted stocks of pesticides under the Africa stockpiles
programme.
While acknowledging South Africa's ratification of the Stockholm
Convention on POPs, which limits the use of incinerators and
cement kilns in the disposal of halogenated materials particularly
POPs waste, the Convention also gives preferential treatment
for the use of non combustion-based approaches to the management
of such waste, including the disposal of hazardous stockpiles.
Burning hazardous waste has the potential to generate and
release considerable quantities of unintentional POPs.
The likely adoption of the BAT/BEP guidelines at the COP
as well as the apparent endorsement of the Dioxin Toolkit
by the national department in South Africa seem indicative
of the strong inclination for combustion-based disposal approaches.
The national department has apparently endorsed the Dioxin
Toolkit without input from civil society. This raises serious
concern since Article 10 of the Stockholm Convention calls
for openness, public participation and full access to information.
Civil society views the toolkit as posing serious limitations
to implementing the Stockholm Convention. Environmentalists
at COP1 are calling on parties to conduct substantial revisions
to the current version of the toolkit including taking into
account data and socio-economic realities of developing countries
and countries with economies in transition. The current version
of the toolkit is seen as largely modelled
around developed countries and would be more compatible for
application in such countries. For example, it allows for
emissions to be reported as single numbers when it would be
more appropriate to reflect them as a range.
Civil society urges the South African government to "Keep
the Promise" and protect people's health and the environment
from harmful chemical resulting from unsustainable waste disposal
practices like incineration. Furthermore, civil society calls
on the South African government to put a stop to the use of
dangerously polluting technology whose operations will virtually
undermine the objectives of the POPS treaty.
For more information:
- Bobby Peek, groundWork - Friends of the Earth, South Africa,
082 464 1383 / 033 342 5662
- Llewellyn Leonard, Days Inn, Punda del Este, Uruguay,
Room 203, Tel: 09 598 42 44 71 16
- Zini Mokhine, Days Inn, Punda del Este, Uruguay, Room
11, Tel: 09 598 42 44 71 16
- Manny Calonzo, Days Inn, Punda del Este, Uruguay, Room
110, Tel: 09 598 42 44 71 16
***
Footnotes:
[1] The Stockholm Convention is a global treaty to protect
human health and the environment from persistent organic pollutants
(POPs). POPs are chemicals that remain intact in the environment
for long periods, become widely distributed geographically,
accumulate in the fatty tissue of living organisms and are
toxic to humans and wildlife. In implementing the Convention,
Governments will take measures to eliminate or reduce the
release of POPs into the environment.
[2] BAT/BEP are waste guidelines that countries could use
to phase in environment and public health compliant disposal
measures and technology.
[3] Dioxin toolkit is a guideline document that countries
could use to measure dioxin emissions with a view to manage
and possibly eliminate the emissions. It is used to assist
countries develop National Implementation Plans, which are
plans to reduce and eventually eliminate Persistent Organic
Pollutants (POPs). However, civil society views it as posing
serious limitations to implementing the Stockholm Convention.
[4] Stockholm Convention document, Annex C, Unintentional
Production, part 2: Source categories |