03 November 2006
“Stop toxic trade!”: NGOs demand tough mercury
limits"
Anti-mercury advocates are urging governments around the
world to ban mercury exports and reduce global mercury pollution
at the forthcoming 24th United Nations Environment Programme
Governing Council meeting in Nairobi on 5-9 February.
groundWork is represented by Rico Euripidou, an environmental
epidemiologist, who is working on alternatives to mercury.
In the five years since UNEP’s Global Mercury Assessment
report, there has been no significant reduction in mercury
use worldwide, according to UNEP’s new mercury trade
report.[i] Trade has stabilised at about 3,500 tonnes per
year for the past decade. As mercury use has gone down in
industrialised nations, developing countries have become increasingly
reliant on this toxic metal. Air pollution experts also report
that global mercury releases into the atmosphere have increased
over the past 15 years (see charts below[ii]).
Anti-mercury campaigners believe that the fundamental cause
of failure over the past two years has been that governments
have only supported voluntary ‘partnership’ programmes,
instead of backing a meaningful, legally-binding agreement,
with the necessary financial assistance and explicit reduction
goals. Advocates insist that global, binding agreements are
the only way to curtail mercury’s worldwide reach.
Mercury poisons the brain and threatens all of us and future
generations, at both high and low levels. So this Governing
Council Decision must have teeth to ensure global action.
Governments must now agree tough and binding rules to reduce
mercury contamination.
“Governments must demonstrate their commitment to immediate
and meaningful action, by adopting legally-binding multilateral
agreements,” said Rico Euripidou, an environmental epidemiologist
from groundWork South Africa. “The scope and direction
of current measures are too limited and on their own they
are insufficient to reduce the risks resulting from mercury
exposure.”
“UNEP’s Governing Council first identified mercury
as a serious global threat over six years ago,” said
Michael Bender of the Mercury Policy Project. “It has
since supported extensive research that all leads to one conclusion:
serious, concerted global action must be taken immediately
to reduce the level of mercury in the environment and protect
fish as a viable world protein source.”
The NGOs recommend curtailing mercury’s global reach
by:-
1. Immediately working towards a globally-binding instrument
on mercury
2. Using the UNEP trade reports’ findings
3. Reducing global mercury demand by setting a target to
reduce it by 70% by 2017, ending mercury use in electronics,
button cell batteries, thermometers, and other non-electronic
measuring equipment, phasing out the mercury-cell chlor-alkali
process, and setting a sector-specific demand reduction goal
to halve artisanal and small-scale gold mining by 2017, eliminating
mercury use in whole ore processing, and other practicable
measures
4. Instructing UNEP to develop a global air emissions report
for the next GC, to form the basis for setting goals to reduce
major sources of airborne mercury emissions
5. Reducing mercury supply by halting primary mining, except
where mercury is a by-product from other ore processing, and
restricting developed nation mercury exports and managing
mercury from closing mercury cell chlor-alkali facilities
6. Developed nations providing new and additional funding
to support these activities in developing nations.
Mercury is a potent nerve poison and affects the brain and
central nervous system. Workers exposed to mercury, e.g. small-scale
gold miners, often suffer from tremors, memory loss and other
neurological damage. Those most at risk from methylmercury-contaminated
food are babies and small children. The brains of babies in
the uterus are the most vulnerable. The greatest risk is to
young women, before or during pregnancy, eating fish containing
high levels of methylmercury (eg shark, swordfish, king mackerel,
and some types of tuna) or miners being exposed during gold
mining.
End:
Notes to editors:-
In 2002, UNEP’s own Global Mercury Assessment concluded
that: “Despite data gaps, sufficient understanding has
been developed of mercury (including knowledge of its fate
and transport, health and environmental impacts, and the role
of human activity), based on extensive research over half
a century, that international actions to address the global
mercury problem should not be delayed.” (GMA, key findings,
#35, see: http://www.chem.unep.ch/Mercury/Report/Key-findings.htm).
For more information please see:
· the special report in preparation of the 24 UNEP
GC:
“NGO Strategy for Addressing the “Global Mercury
Crisis” at the February 2007 UNEP Governing Council
Meeting http://www.zeromercury.org/UNEP_developments/070130NGOs_addressing_Global_Mercury_Crisis_for_2007_UNEP_GC.pdf
· The NGOs submission to UNEP “NGOs
Proposal for a Global Mercury Strategy at the 2007 UNEP Governing
Council Meeting” 24 January 2007,
http://www.zeromercury.org/UNEP_developments/NGO
20UNEP 20GC 20Proposal 20- 202007REV.pdf
· the Report of the “Stay Healthy, Stop Mercury”
campaign on health implications of mercury contamination,
http://www.env-health.org/r/145
 
Figs 1 and 2
Footnotes:-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[i] Both available in a single document at http://www.chem.unep.ch/mercury/Trade-information.htm
[ii] Figure 1 is derived from the recently published UNEP
mercury trade report prepared for the 5-9 February 2007 Governing
Council meeting, and indicates global mercury use has changed
little since 1994 as the developed world exports its excess
mercury and outdated technologies to the developing world.
Figure 2 is based on the work of Jozef Pacyna and his colleagues,
and illustrates that atmospheric mercury releases have actually
increased, from sources such as coal combustion, smelting
of metal ores (particularly zinc and copper), chlor-alkali
plants, and waste handling/disposal of products containing
mercury.
For more information please contact:-
- Rico Euripidou, groundWork , S.Africa T: +254-721274317;
+27-333425662, rico@groundwork.org.za;
www.groundwork.org.za
- *Linda Greer, Natural Resources Defense Council, Tel:+1
202 289 6868; Email:, www.nrdc.org
- Michael Bender, Mercury Policy Project: Tel: +1 802 249-8543;
Email:, www.mercurypolicy.org
- Elena Lymberidi, European Environmental Bureau : Tel:
+32 (0)2 2891301;
Mobile: +32 (0)496 532818 ;Email : elena.lymberidi@eeb.org,
www.zeromercury@eeb.org
- Lisette van Vliet, Health & Environment Alliance;
Health Care Without Harm Europe,
T:+32 2 234 3645., www.env-health.org,
www.noharm.org
- [*Linda Greer is the Zero Mercury press officer]
|